Skip to content

Hugo vs Jekyll

Reviewed byRoman K
Tagline
Hugo: The world's fastest static site generator
Jekyll: Static site generator powered by Ruby
Pricing Model
Hugo: open-source
Jekyll: open-source
Starting Price
Hugo: $0/mo
Jekyll: $0/mo
Free Plan
Hugo: Yes
Jekyll: Yes
GitHub Stars
Hugo: 88.8k
Jekyll: 51.5k
npm Downloads/wk
Hugo:
Jekyll:
GitHub Forks
Hugo: 8.3k
Jekyll: 10.3k
Open Issues
Hugo: 227
Jekyll: 248
Tags
Hugo: go, static, open-source, fast
Jekyll: ruby, static, github-pages, blog

Hugo vs Jekyll: which to choose

Hugo has the larger community with 88.8k GitHub stars against 51.5k for Jekyll, which usually means more integrations, examples and third-party help when you get stuck.

Choose Hugo if you lean toward go and static; choose Jekyll if ruby and static matters more for your stack. All figures above are pulled from live GitHub and pricing data, not vendor marketing.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hugo or Jekyll better?

It depends on your priorities. Hugo has 88.8k GitHub stars and uses a open-source pricing model, while Jekyll has 51.5k stars and uses a open-source model. Both offer a free plan so you can try each before committing.

Is Hugo cheaper than Jekyll?

Hugo starts at $0/mo while Jekyll starts at $0/mo. Hugo has a free plan. Jekyll has a free plan.

What are the main differences between Hugo and Jekyll?

Hugo is tagged as go, static, open-source while Jekyll is tagged as ruby, static, github-pages. Hugo uses a open-source pricing model and has a community of 88.8k GitHub stars. Jekyll uses a open-source model with 51.5k GitHub stars.

Does Hugo or Jekyll have a free plan?

Yes, both Hugo and Jekyll offer a free plan.

More comparisons