Skip to content

NATS vs RabbitMQ

Reviewed byRoman K
Tagline
NATS: Simple, secure and high-performance messaging
RabbitMQ: Most widely deployed open source message broker
Pricing Model
NATS: open-source
RabbitMQ: open-source
Starting Price
NATS: $0/mo
RabbitMQ: $0/mo
Free Plan
NATS: Yes
RabbitMQ: Yes
GitHub Stars
NATS: 20.1k
RabbitMQ: 13.7k
npm Downloads/wk
NATS: 840.0k
RabbitMQ: 2.5M
GitHub Forks
NATS: 1.9k
RabbitMQ: 4.0k
Open Issues
NATS: 517
RabbitMQ: 251
Tags
NATS: messaging, cncf, pub-sub, open-source
RabbitMQ: amqp, broker, open-source, erlang

NATS vs RabbitMQ: which to choose

NATS has the larger community with 20.1k GitHub stars against 13.7k for RabbitMQ, which usually means more integrations, examples and third-party help when you get stuck.

Choose NATS if you lean toward messaging and cncf; choose RabbitMQ if amqp and broker matters more for your stack. All figures above are pulled from live GitHub and pricing data, not vendor marketing.

Frequently asked questions

Is NATS or RabbitMQ better?

It depends on your priorities. NATS has 20.1k GitHub stars and uses a open-source pricing model, while RabbitMQ has 13.7k stars and uses a open-source model. Both offer a free plan so you can try each before committing.

Is NATS cheaper than RabbitMQ?

NATS starts at $0/mo while RabbitMQ starts at $0/mo. NATS has a free plan. RabbitMQ has a free plan.

What are the main differences between NATS and RabbitMQ?

NATS is tagged as messaging, cncf, pub-sub while RabbitMQ is tagged as amqp, broker, open-source. NATS uses a open-source pricing model and has a community of 20.1k GitHub stars. RabbitMQ uses a open-source model with 13.7k GitHub stars.

Does NATS or RabbitMQ have a free plan?

Yes, both NATS and RabbitMQ offer a free plan.

More comparisons