Skip to content

Hugo vs Zola

Reviewed byRoman K
Tagline
Hugo: The world's fastest static site generator
Zola: Single-binary static site generator in Rust
Pricing Model
Hugo: open-source
Zola: open-source
Starting Price
Hugo: $0/mo
Zola: $0/mo
Free Plan
Hugo: Yes
Zola: Yes
GitHub Stars
Hugo: 88.8k
Zola: 17.2k
npm Downloads/wk
Hugo:
Zola:
GitHub Forks
Hugo: 8.3k
Zola: 1.1k
Open Issues
Hugo: 227
Zola: 368
Tags
Hugo: go, static, open-source, fast
Zola: rust, static, single-binary, open-source

Hugo vs Zola: which to choose

Hugo has the larger community with 88.8k GitHub stars against 17.2k for Zola, which usually means more integrations, examples and third-party help when you get stuck.

Choose Hugo if you lean toward go and static; choose Zola if rust and static matters more for your stack. All figures above are pulled from live GitHub and pricing data, not vendor marketing.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hugo or Zola better?

It depends on your priorities. Hugo has 88.8k GitHub stars and uses a open-source pricing model, while Zola has 17.2k stars and uses a open-source model. Both offer a free plan so you can try each before committing.

Is Hugo cheaper than Zola?

Hugo starts at $0/mo while Zola starts at $0/mo. Hugo has a free plan. Zola has a free plan.

What are the main differences between Hugo and Zola?

Hugo is tagged as go, static, open-source while Zola is tagged as rust, static, single-binary. Hugo uses a open-source pricing model and has a community of 88.8k GitHub stars. Zola uses a open-source model with 17.2k GitHub stars.

Does Hugo or Zola have a free plan?

Yes, both Hugo and Zola offer a free plan.

More comparisons